• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    On one hand, this is a huge grey zone in terms of privacy. But on the other hand, it’s also a huge win for anybody who has had to endure unsolicited dick pics. I used to work with a woman who had a stalker that would send her “tribute” photos from spoofed numbers to appear as people in her contact list; this feature wouldn’t have completely blocked the messages, but would have at least mitigated some of the trauma she went through.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 days ago

      Then it should be at the phone level. Setting of: blur photos from unknown contacts.

      All this google function has done is get parents in trouble with the law and closed google accounts when telehealth doctors have asked for pictures of their kids rashes for diagnosis

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I know the story you’re referring to, that’s something different. That was a cloud-based storage scanning, this appears to be running entirely locally on the user’s device.

        Imo, it’s a better solution, but still not perfect, and not immune to abuse.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yeah facebooks WhatsApp was doing local phone scanning of content and then reporting back to the mothership. Its under the guise of protecting kids from abuse, but it can also be nefarious if Facebook is pressured by the government to also include a scan of anti administration talk, or a person search. Just too Orwellian in my opinion