• Deme@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yes, the comment I replied to is technically right in that there are some tiny countries out there. Or they would be, if the rocket in question would’ve been a vastly larger rocket that burned a carbon containing fuel. The New Shepard tourist joyride is tiny for a rocket and its exhaust is water vapour.

      • bravesirthomas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Although I doubt it, hydrogen can be produced using renewables.

        It’s still going to be significantly “greener” than using methane as a propellant, though.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Where did they get all the hydrogen? How did they make the rocket. While it may not emit much carbon on launch day, it will have taken a shit load to produce it.

      • Deme@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I was talking about the direct emissions of launching a rocket. The indirect emissions are obviously vastly larger and might as well include everything in the wider economy that enables stuff like this. Just maintaining the necessary industrial capacity is already a huge strain on the planet. That’s what I’m after with these comments. The rich fucker joyride is a largely inconsequential yet overtly visible result of a bloated system hiding in plain sight. The aerospace sector as a whole is just the tip of the iceberg of a global industrial society in ecological overshoot.