cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 7 days agoViolencelemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down181cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1external-linkViolencelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square119fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up23·6 days agoCan’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
minus-squareSlam_Eye@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoWho has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 days agoUsually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoMoral authority is always dubious, violence or not.
Can’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
Who has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
Usually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
Moral authority is always dubious, violence or not.