• SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Honest question from a non native: what is wrong with the term female?

    And what word could you use for the sex girls and women are part of where people wouldn’t imagine you look like a space neolib?

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Non-native as well but for me, “female” is an adjective and only used as a noun in technical setting. If used in regular conversation setting, it’s condescending and dehumanizing.

      Good:

      • There are fifteen females in the survey.
      • The female is more aggressive, typical of hyenas.
      • You bought the wrong USB cable, this one is a female.

      Bad:

      • This female is not very good at her job.
      • You females need to tone it down.
    • MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ll be real here: no one irl cares, we’re so careless with our language people understand what you mean more by vibes than vocabulary. I’ve not heard a single person take umbrage with female outside of the internet.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Female is still an acceptable term in some context: eg, when referring to the social group on a societal level, female can be fine, also for identifying someone’s genetic/biological sex as “female” for medical/official contexts, that’s still okay in most cases.

      Where it’s not okay is to use it on an individual level or to refer to a small group of ladies. The term is seem as cold, clinical, and in some cases, dehumanizing. It comes off as boiling down a person to their function in reproduction and nothing more. “You are the female and you carry children.” Kind of thing. Like women are some kind of bakery for your crotch goblins, and not people worthy of respect.

      But something like “the female population of the country” is fairly okay, since you’re referring to the entirely of the people who identify as female, not an individual or small group of individuals.

      At least, that’s my take. I’m just some guy. If any women want to correct me, I defer to your judgement and opinion, and happily retract any contradictory statements I may have made. I am always happy to be corrected.

      • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Okay I understand.

        So “books with female protagonists” would be okay (because large group referenced) “Bus with female passengers” would be considered rude, because small group referenced, you would rather say “Bus with women and girls as passengers” ?

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Short answer: It’s a turn of phrase the Incel movement popularized as a dehumanizing dogwhistle.

      Long answer: In current American English, “Female” and “Females” are highly formal terms and really are only commonly used in situations like law and academic discourse (this is true of “male” and “males” as well, though there’s much less cultural baggage associated with those terms). People who use them in casual conversation instead of the much more common “Women” (or the diminutive, “Girls”) tend to be the kind of person that uses formal language to emphasize their own intellectual superiority over the common masses, and in particular all the women who won’t have sex with them. In fact and almost invariably, this is presented in the form of explanations about why nobody wants to have sex with them, and the cultural forces that are causing it, and why deep down it’s the women’s fault they can’t get a date, and it just all goes downhill from there.

      edit: clarity

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What the guys behind closed doors at the Republican Party leadership look like when they take their mask off.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, a handsome specimen of the Ferengi species. I hear he was even the Grand Nagus briefly. And look at those lobes.

  • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool it over there. I look like that but I don’t call women females. That was very unwarranted.

  • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do you post my appearance like that? Honestly, it’s derogatory to relate my kind of people with the assholes.

  • Pinklink@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was once explaining to someone how a group of my family is part of a “religion” which is really a cult. I was saying how females (being inclusive of the adult women and young girls) in this cult have no body autonomy and how fucked up it is. I was interrupted to be informed that the term female should not be used. They interrupted my explanation of how my fucking family member is being forced to get pregnant over and over, how the girls are being treated like property or pets, because correcting my use of the word female was more important. I will never forget or forgive this moment. I hope this anecdote highlights priorities for everyone that has such a strong opinion about this. Also, I imagine if I wasn’t male, this would have been a nonissue. I don’t know about anyone else, but I actually do want equality. Double standards are outdated.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I will never forget or forgive this moment.

      (emphasis mine) Moments where someone’s heart was in the right place are the most forgivable for me

      If I could choose my reaction it mighttttttt be akin to….

      “LOL did you just knee jerk reaction b/c ‘female’ is word of the week on fascist social media? Well thanks for caring but this will derail us for a thirty-second language & comprehension lesson…”

    • Bunnylux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Context is important. In your case, you’re using female to designate a biological characteristic - aka, a reproductive ability that the cult is specifically exploiting. Some men, especially online, use “female” in a way where normally someone would use the term “woman”, in an attempt to dehumanize women. It’s unfortunate that the person you were talking to couldn’t tell the difference, but as for never forgiving them, maybe a gentle correction could be more warranted?

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Hey, bigots say this and it makes people sound like bigots when they say it”

      “I used that word correctly and was told that it made me sound like a bigot. Maybe think about that?”

      Cool, maybe get mad at the bigots who ruined the word for people rather than the people saying the word was ruined by bigots.

      It’s like when people get mad at the r-slur being a slur now. Like, no, it was always intended as an insult based on medical language. It was always going to become a slur.

      Now people are using the word female to both alienate and other women in their language and to “sound smarter” when showing bigotry. Also, you were probably told to not say it because they knew you were better than the assholes who say it in a demeaning way. Maybe… think about that?

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        How about we just stop letting bigots have every fucking word and don’t assume negative qualities about people from an insignificant distinction, cultures are different and just assuming someone is a bigot because they used the word female in a proper context is absolutely idiotic and counter productive to actually fighting real bigotry

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Never assumed this person was a bigot. The point being made is that “female” is now a dog whistle word for the alt-right. Dog whistles by themselves aren’t proof that someone is a bigot, but they are still words associated with bigotry.

          You can’t control what words become dog-whistles (Jean-Paul Sartre quote “But they(anti-semites) are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words”) but you can acknowledge that they ARE dog whistles without it being some moral failing to point it out.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I am talking more generally, not just you in this instance.

            We shouldn’t keep seeding ground to fascists over which words are “theirs” a simple and inconsequential example is Pepe the frog, there is nothing inherently racist about it and there are hordes of wholesome pepe memes, but someone decided that because it also gets coopted by fascists and racists that now pepe is actually a symbol for racism.

            This is idiotic that we are HANDING bad actors the right to own words and ideas by self policing.

            • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t disagree, but I don’t see how you can do that. Well, I kind of do, that’s by “taking the word back”, poisoning the meaning of the word or its association so that hateful people won’t want to be associated with it. I know it’s definitely not shaming people for calling out that it’s a dog whistle. Because, again, that puts the moral failing on the person calling it out rather than the people who gave it the negative association to begin with.

              That quickly becomes “ugh, these fucking SJWs policing everyone’s speech” instead of “ugh, these fucking losers ruining perfectly good words with their hatred”, which it should be.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                I agree there isn’t an easy answer, I just don’t think giving them power over the words is actually helping anyone, because it does turn into the SJW situation like you pointed out.

                Humungus Wut intensifies

                It devolved into people MAKING problems were there wasn’t actually one by assuming negative intent.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Cool, maybe get mad at the bigots who ruined the word for people rather than the people saying the word was ruined by bigots.

        A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: “I am sorry, but I couldn’t help myself. It’s my character.”

        good luck getting the bigots to change.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Who said anything about getting them to change? Getting mad at people because the word changed instead of getting mad at the people who changed the word is my point. There’s a reason why that word was targeted as a dog whistle, but it is still a dog whistle now and acknowledging that it is isn’t some moral wrong.