Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works to Shitty Food Porn@lemmy.ca · edit-22 months agoCrimes against breakfastssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkCrimes against breakfastssh.itjust.worksMadbrad200@sh.itjust.works to Shitty Food Porn@lemmy.ca · edit-22 months agomessage-square120fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecourval@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoThis is quite confusing at least for a non native like me… I’ve always been told ‘they’ is plural… It’s feels a bit like when megalomaniac people refer to themselves as we. Why not make a new pronoun if no other suitable singular exists?
minus-squareAlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoBecause English got simplified at various points in history. We’ve lost thee and thou and thy. As awkward as singular they might seem, it’s so old that Shakespeare used it.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoTime to improve and learn the real definition then.
minus-squarebrisk@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoIf it helps to relate it to something else, “you” also has plural grammar but can refer to a singular.
This is quite confusing at least for a non native like me… I’ve always been told ‘they’ is plural… It’s feels a bit like when megalomaniac people refer to themselves as we. Why not make a new pronoun if no other suitable singular exists?
Because English got simplified at various points in history. We’ve lost thee and thou and thy.
As awkward as singular they might seem, it’s so old that Shakespeare used it.
Time to improve and learn the real definition then.
Well, now you know better.
If it helps to relate it to something else, “you” also has plural grammar but can refer to a singular.