• easily3667@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    But all it gets you for $900 is to…do a worse version of what your phone does, in public? I don’t get it.

    To answer op you have to give people a reason why. Learning the technology seems valid but not at that price point.

    • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean, if you look at it that way, yeah. But to me the science is cool, and there’s a few other aspects that I enjoy as well. I outlined it here.

      You can learn the technology for significantly less if you’re motivated, and handy. $100 for a 5w HF radio. That’s half the fun is learning.

      But also, if that’s not enticing, then maybe it’s just not for you, and that’s ok 🤷‍♂️

      • Twitchy1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Those inexpensive, although less traditional means is the answer to the question that started this thread.

        They need to be promoted and advertised above all else. Once someone is interested then you can add in the expensive things.

        Example, I race RCs. Just the chassis of some of the cars is well above $500(I use $100 3racing Chinese knock offs and extremely very competitive with them btw). These cars are raced on perfectly flat and prepared asphalt so it’s very niche. The club wants members to race… We don’t tell people that come to watch that they should buy the $1500 car&radio, nobody will join. We have several classes that are “starters”. The cost of the cars is $100-200 ready to race. It’s not fast at all but it’s cheap enough to see if you want it. It’s also cheap and easy to maintain. Most people enjoy the inexpensive racing that fills the majority of the day.

        The hobby needs to adapt to the complaints/requests of people not actively involved but willing to give it a try.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Agreed, but OP is asking how you get people (ie it’s not ok if it’s not for you // or // we want people more aware of this) – for someone approaching a new hobby you usually do need something lower cost because people don’t know if they’re into it. The counterpoint would be rich people I suppose who can go all in before they know they like something.

        But that’s good to know there are more approachable things to learn.

        • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I guess that’s fair. My “it’s ok if it’s not for you” was more of a specific platitude for him because we’d already discussed some of the options available, and he’s already put some effort in and decided it wasn’t for him 🤷‍♂️

          I agree we need to entice more people, I don’t have a good answer as to how. If someone looks into it, and makes an informed decision, then I’m not going to twist their arm.

          One thing I’ve tried with my friends kids is to take them out and do POTA in the woods, let them run a pileup. They really seem to enjoy it, enough to stay studying, but not enough to follow through. What can you do? 🤷‍♂️