I was looking for someone saying this. He was envisioning a bunch of us poors fighting each other when he called for civil war. He never thought it would be all of us against him.
It really does show that violence might be the only way to get through to these people. Not that I would ever advocate for such a thing directly myself of course of course. But if this is the only thing that gets their attention, it seems like he’s inviting more of it.
He assumed his opponents would kill random people instead of targeting his property.
He probably can’t even comprehend a worldview where people prefer to attack wealth over taking another human being’s life.
That would require empathy, which he considers a weakness. So he probably is genuinely baffled by this.
I don’t know if he consider that a weakness.
He’s a narcissist and it’s how they work, they just miss empathy and they can’t recognize their errors.
He considers it a fundamental weakness of Western society.
I was looking for someone saying this. He was envisioning a bunch of us poors fighting each other when he called for civil war. He never thought it would be all of us against him.
It really does show that violence might be the only way to get through to these people. Not that I would ever advocate for such a thing directly myself of course of course. But if this is the only thing that gets their attention, it seems like he’s inviting more of it.