• Sheldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.

      • Sheldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.

        You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.

          That’s literally what I’m saying.

          • Sheldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You are saying it’s union members vs non union members being separated.

            And it’s not.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The union members are included in the “we” that contractually makes $0.50/hr more than… union members?

              • Sheldan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The contract negotiated by the unions just defines the minimum, union members can earn more.