• psivchaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    To the company it is “an adjustment.” To those people, it can be a devastating loss of healthcare, of the money they use to pay for food and shelter, and even an identity crisis. Starbucks has all sorts of positions, ranging from seasonal part time employees, to store management that gets paid pretty well, to corporate employees that presumed they were in 20y career trajectories. Every single one of them deserves better than losing their job just to pay for a big bonus for one guy.

    It’s not about whether they are allowed or not. It’s that actions should have consequences but the modern corporate structure has so divorced leadership from the consequence of their actions that this is normal. Let me rephrase: Hurting people to pump your personal wealth is not just normal, it’s expected. That’s sick.

    • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol, okay, blame starbucks all you want, it’s a faceless entity. You could be mad at the politicians who set you up to instantly fall into desperation the moment you lose a minimum wage job, but if you want to be mad and ineffectual at the same time, be my guest.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        it’s a faceless entity.

        Not only does it have a face…

        … It’s a perfectly punchable face.

        • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Okay, you go do whatever you can to that face and come back and tell me what changed. The answer will be nothing.

      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I don’t understand why you think it’s either/or? I didn’t say, “Starbucks is solely to blame” or anything of the sort. It’s incredibly stupid that living requires an employer, and that’s something we need to fix, but as long as it does they should act and be treated like they have the ethical responsibility they’ve been given.

        Maybe you should stop giving people free passes for psychopathy just because it’s within the law.

        • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 hours ago

          There’s a fucking recession coming you dolt, ofcourse large companies are going to dump people, and it doesnt take a psychopath to do it.

          Your hearts in the right place, but if you cant be realistic about the why and how of running a business, i dont want your opinions.

          • tischbier@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s a self made recession by the corporations themselves. A thousand employees don’t matter to their bottom line.

            If preparing for a recession is to blame here, then why at the same time are the Starbucks board giving the CEO $96 million buckadoos?

            • RaptorBenn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Likely to get him to stay in the position because the board or whatever thinks he is worth that much to keep on. I’m not saying they got their moneys worth but they obviously thought so. They arent handing him a bonus as big as that as a pat on the back.