• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Current timeline feels like one alternative Red Alert timeline, where alongside of Hitler, Stalin also got erased from history, and now Russia and the US have turned fascistic.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Never have I been more pleased to see a foreign navies nuclear attack sub in my nations waters.

    (odd times)

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s a French sub though so it probably only fires gag missiles that just have a white flag on a stick at the tip.

    Jokes aside can you smoke on a sub? Cause I know a lot of the French still habitually smoke cigarettes and I imagine that would do a number on the oxygen system. Let alone the dangers of possibly setting fires in a pressurized container deep underwater.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. 🤔🤔🤔 Merci a la belle France 🇫🇷🤝🇨🇦

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      An article using random reddit comments as a source should be outright ignored, IMO.

      Especially when said reddit comment has since been edited and no longer reflects what’s written in the article. If you bother to follow the reddit link in the article, you’ll find someone has replied with an actual source (from France) that shows that the photos are legit, however the title of this post (and the original posts on reddit) are misleading.

      This isn’t in reaction to American threats, it’s a French naval defense company showing off their submarine in the hopes of obtaining a 60 billion dollar contract for twelve submarines that the Canadian government announced last summer.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Important note: The “Nuclear” in “Nuclear attack submarine” means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An “attack” submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

  • BookSnob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thank you France. You will forever get my family’s commitment to tourism. I look forward to visiting every year. 🇨🇦❤️🇫🇷

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t tease me!

    NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

    🇫🇷🦅🎆

  • boke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

    • jimd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What’s the point of these submarines if there aren’t nukes on them?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Regardless, it’s presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

      Though I’d be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They don’t need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It’s not like fascists can’t find a casus belli. Putin was “restoring Russian glory” or some such. Trump would be “finishing the American Revolution” or some other bullshit.

      Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

      Just please, don’t harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don’t close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime’s enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean, they’re not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

      We don’t know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I’m sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It’s yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

        • Gronk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Morrison knew what he was doing, the sub deal was to poison the chalice before Labor gained the majority.

          Unfortunately for the walking sack of salmonella and shitty curry, his wrangler (Murdoch) managed to sway the election enough to get the LNP back in power.

          I have actually met Morrison in person once (friends of friends of friends) and he is a fucking moron but JFC he’s at least a brain cell or two ahead of Dutton

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I dunno … Dutton seems smarter, but more evil. Morrison just seems like a brainwashed idiot who’s failed upwards. I don’t know how anyone looks at the screaming void of evil that is Dutton and thinks “yeah that thing has my best interests at heart … or a heart”

            • Gronk@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 hours ago

              They’re just two different flavours of evil, Morrison is a happy clapper pentecostalist “God favours the rich” evil and Dutton is an ex-corrupt cop who wants authoritarianism under his rule evil.

              They both don’t have the critical thinking to realise the damage they do or why men like them shouldn’t hold positions of power, but Dutton following right out of Trumps playbook despite international backlash is a pretty good case for dumb-as-fuck syndrome.

              But I agree, it’s absurd that we have these stooges running for parliament I don’t know how we got here…

          • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m still not entirely sure how Australia seemingly wound up with a modified Westminster system that was worse than the original, genuinely pretty impressive.

            • dellish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 hours ago

              The only reason it’s worse is because we have a strong Murdoch media bias, so the general public are pretty ill-informed. With everyone being fed bullshit so often it’s easy to get them to vote against their best interests.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 hours ago

                at least we have proportional representation

                Only in the Senate. And only on a per-state basis, so it’s only as proportional as “a proportion of 6” can be…which is much less proportional than a proportion of 40, like if the Senate were done nationally.

  • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    During a period with seemingly very little good news in the world, I really needed this. Assuming it was done for the optics it conveys, it’s some much needed reassurance that our allies actually have our back. Granted, we’re still absolutely fucked in the short term if the worst happens, it’s still nice to see.