pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 2 days agonuked from orbitmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linknuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square41fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agohaha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 day agoIt’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-223 hours agoIt’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).