pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agonuked from orbitmander.xyzimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagenuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square41linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agohaha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIt’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoIt’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).