𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 12 days agoWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square199fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.ml𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square199fedilinkfile-text
It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?
minus-squareCutecity [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoNo, gravity is faster than light. If there was this lag, we wouldn’t have stable orbits exactly because of the lag you describe. Wave functions of photons also collapse faster than light when they hit absorbent material.
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agowave function (something that does not travel) collapses (something that does not move either) faster than light (themselves?) this word soup does not make sense
minus-squarehedgehog@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agohttps://bigthink.com/hard-science/speed-of-gravity/
No, gravity is faster than light. If there was this lag, we wouldn’t have stable orbits exactly because of the lag you describe. Wave functions of photons also collapse faster than light when they hit absorbent material.
wave function (something that does not travel) collapses (something that does not move either) faster than light (themselves?)
this word soup does not make sense
https://bigthink.com/hard-science/speed-of-gravity/