JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1367arrow-down110
arrow-up1357arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squarercbrk@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-216 hours agoAnyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoAnyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes. I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon. If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.
Anyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
Anyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes.
I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon.
If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.