• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would describe Elon Musk as an autistic adult whose weird behavior patterns and way too much money are dangerous in a system that gives money way too much power.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I would say your friend’s actions need to be watched and controlled because they’re dangerous, and that the friend as a person needs help.

    • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Autism =/= fascism or even being an insensitive moron. Autistic people are often highly sensitive to such topics.

      You’re painting autistic people in a bad light. There is nothing about autism that excuses such behavior.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t think he’s trying to excuse it. I think he’s saying you’d view an autistic Nazi walmart greeter more differently than you’d view an autistic Nazi whose already the wealthiest man in the world, and society’s values are letting that wealth have a huge platform and allowing him to basically run the country unilaterally.

        An autistic Nazi plebian doesn’t have that kind of influence. Many people would probably pity them. An autistic Nazi being given the world is probably a bad thing.

        • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You want to argue that armchair psychology is more important in this situation than condemning doing a Nazi salute?

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Armchair psychology and armchair political rants are both armchair activities., so neither is more important, and they can both happen at the same time.

            It’s just interesting that all statements about <bad guy du jour> are considered support if they aren’t condemnation. If you said Bill Cosby used to do funny standup for example, you would be flooded with hate because the only acceptable reason to mention Cosby is condemn him for being horrible. But understanding the psychology of horrible people is actually important. Think how it would be if you got a rectal disease and it turned out there was no cure because assholes are gross so nobody studies them and anybody who mentions them except to rant about how disgusting they are gets pounded with douchevotes and called a pervert. Objective talk about aspects of sociopaths should be okay. Don’t be the Christian who clutches their rosary every time somebody says “Satan”.

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I think extreme wealth is a matter of luck. Lots of equally clever, equally hardworking people succeed moderately, but extreme wealth and success are a perfect storm of timing, economics, and a lot of other things that nobody controls.