• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    You contradict yourself in the first paragraph.

    It is a spectrum, which is why “anybody who isn’t an authoritarian is a libertarian” is not true.

    • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I don’t understand why you think that is a contradiction. You both agree there’s a spectrum between the two. Technically, if you’re not 100% authoritarian you have a greater-than-zero alignment with libertarianism.

      Now, if you’re trying to say landing somewhere in the middle of the spectrum means you’re neither, then I tend to agree with you (labels suck). However, I’d take it a step further and say that nobody is going to be the 100% perfect embodiment of either end of the spectrum, and therefore, no true authoritarian or libertarian exists. I think, to say either one of you is wrong is just arguing semantics.

        • Forester@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You either like authority or you don’t. That’s binary. How much you like or dislike it is the spectrum.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Do you not understand what a spectrum is? It cannot be both binary AND a spectrum. Those two things are mutually exclusive. Bimodal perhaps (though I don’t think it is in this case), but not binary.

          • silasmariner@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Or you appreciate authority in some matters, but reject it in others. That’s the point in the spectrum that rejects the simple binary.

            Edit: just realised both my last posts were responding to you. I’m not stalking or weird shit I swear! It just happened I woke up with more opinions!

        • Forester@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          the word libertarian literally does mean what I’m telling you though . What your experiencing is that your personal definition is not matching up with everyone else’s reality. You’ve just been misinformed and have only been exposed to a subset of libertarian ideals . To put this in an analogy it’s like if I said truck and you assumed I was talking about a Ford F-350 when in fact I’m referring to all trucks. From tiny k trucks to 18 wheeler big rigs

          • silasmariner@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            No, what I’m experiencing is the conventional meaning of the term as used by people in normal language not matching up with a technical definition that you favour. It’s fine that you prefer to use the word that way, you just can’t expect everyone else to

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Lol at that person’s reply: “No, but the chart says it’s true!”

              These people have some desperate need for neat little boxes, each with their own designation, to put themselves and others into, and that’s just not how the world works.

            • Forester@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Well you seem to be in the minority here so it would appear that the majority of people understand my definition as correct since that’s the definition as defined in multiple dictionaries.