Donald Flanders

So that’s how narco traffickers can defend themselves - carry oil on their boats.

Well, Lukashenko also said it, and the editor of RT said. But yes.

The other evidence they use is the feint that was sent directly at Kiev. They think the feint was a real genuine attempt to capture the capital city, and then from there take all the evidence that it was a feint and spin it into bad planning. So specifically, if you send a feint, and you’re committed to that entire allocation of soldiers being wiped out, you don’t send them in with supplies to last for a long slog - you send them in ultra light on a suicide mission. And that’s essentially what the deployment to Kiev was, a group with an ultralight kit heading straight for Kiev to draw out forces and create confusion in the early days of the war. That feint was destroyed and then when they realized it was feint they spun it hard into “look at these fools who thought they could end this thing in three days” basically as a way of avoiding the obvious conclusion that they wasted time dealing with a trick.

It would be like if someone sent a feint filled with woodland creatures and animated scarecrows and after you waste strategically valuable time dealing with them you spend the rest of the war saying “this opponent is so dumb they thought they could win with scarecrows” when the reality is that you got tricked and the feint did exactly what it was intended to do.

Keep commenting, keep getting critique, listen learn and grow

Focus isn’t the thing that helps. It’s iteration.

You are raised in a conceptual framework that predisposes you to think about new things in specific ways. To get a more accurate worldview, you need more iterations, you need to explore new experiences, you need to see the same things presented in slightly different ways.

Above all else, though, you need to make posts and comments like this, and you need to have live conversations where you express your current understanding and you need to receive feedback. Sometimes you’re wrong, sometimes your omitting something, sometimes you have a good grip on it. You can’t just focus and read and hope to have correct understanding. These things are not dead concepts that can pinned to the pages of a book - they are living dynamic understandings generated through dialogue.l

Geopolitics understander, right here

Man, you are just itching for nuclear war aren’t you? You really want a nuclear-armed transnational force with zero democratic accountability to go and fight another nuclear armed power that is currently fighting explicitly to prevent that nuclear-armed transnational force from expanding its control of the region? That is literally nuclear escalation. You gotta get out of the death cult you’re in.

It was an industrial war. Yes, the command was critical. Yes allies were critical. But Stalin directed the economy on the basis of a prediction of the war in a way that I don’t think any other economic thinker at the time would have

Do we think that the level of development of the local Soviets and the higher order Soviets was sufficient enough to coordinate the necessary response to the threat of the Third Reich? As far as I understand it, even with Stalin’s significant control he still had opposition to the idea that Germany would be such a near-term threat and such a massive one. Maybe I am wrong about that.

Precolonial non-European societies had sports. The precolonial societies of what we call the Americas had sports. The precolonial societies of what we call Australia has sports.

It is useful to have the concept of a winner when you are trying to promote excellence of a capability that inheres in the individual. Running is a great example. There’s a reason why running has individual competitions and group competitions. The sinple foot race promotes excellence of an individual capability in all that participate, raising the level of the capability for the whole group while having an individual winner in any given competition. But the relay race has teams that win, not individuals because the problem being solved is a combination of individual excellence and excellence in communion.

Problem solving competitions are far better as team competitions than group competitions. There is a winning team, but no individualism. But, for problem solving competitions, even the losers can produce novel solutions that benefit everyone after the competition.

There are plenty of “games” that are fully cooperative and simply have a shared objective. Hunting big game is a classic problem, but the stakes are high so high that you need similar games/play to build up the skills. For this games you create a single shared objective and everyone is on the same team attempting to achieve it. Sometimes the single team is opposed to a single person or small group who are tasked with making the objective harder, as in a “find the mcguffin” style game where the elders hide the mcguffin. But sometimes games like this can ALSO be broken into teams for competition - orienteering competitions come to mind. Which team can hit the objective fastest? Similar to a relay race, while there are teams competing, they are not competing like on a football pitch.

It’s ableism to believe that team sports are limited only to the temporarily abled. Team sports are enjoyed by people across a WIDE spectrum of ability and disability.

Your tribalism point literally has nothing to do with playing a sport and everything to do with fandoms. Most people who have played sports know this, hence my derisive comment.

CTE happens to people who play sports where heads get knocked. What does that have to do with anything we’re talking about? What a ridiculous bullet point. At this point you’re just spraying and praying that just saying stuff will give you a win. Competitive much?

Arm wrestling is literally a competitive sport. People have been doing it for centuries, it developed rules and techniques, people train for it so they can compete, and eventually leagues have formed to recognize excellence in the sport.

Competition always exists is nothing like it’s easier to imagine the end of the world than of capitalism. In the latter, it’s a problem to solve and people are so immersed in the problem they think it’s impossible. In the former it’s literally built into the hormonal reward circuits of humans and many other animals. Play is crucial and competitive play is a form of play. Foot races are competitive.

You remember being told during nursery how to excel at a given task? Do you remember being told it’s important to wash your hands before eating, or that it’s important to clear your work area before painting, or that it’s important to hold the drum stick just so in order to bang on things to make noise?

Hell, throwing the ball in from the line isn’t even much of a competitive action. I would have thought you would say “I remember in nursery they told me to keep track of the score and make sure my team was winning”, but no, your example isn’t even about competition it’s about performance, excellence, etc.

I see you’ve never played a competitive sport.

The tribalism you talk about is branding and fandoms. Competition will always exist. People will arm wrestle, people will have contests to see who can do something better than others.

Under communism we will still have sports.

How about this one

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/america-just-quietly-admitted-cant-crush-russias-economy-bw-120125

DSA does not in any way fill the role PSL has decided to take up. Again, PSL is not a militia. It does not engage in physical confrontation and it does not encourage physical confrontation. It is not a decentralized leaderless org that is immune from disruption by the state. It is a mass movement building engine along Leninist revolutionary lines.

If you think PSL and DSA are equivalent, then your obviously poorly informed and if you’re poorly informed and also encouraging people to abandon the PSL then you’re a wrecker

No they didn’t. PSL is not a militia. They defined their strategic boundaries and have been consistent with those boundaries for years. They do not engage in physical confrontations and they do not go toe to toe with police forces.

Telling people to physically engage ICE is not only irresponsible as a party but grounds for federal investigations and disruption of the party itself.

It’s literally Harvard

The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs is the hub of Harvard Kennedy School’s research, teaching, and training in international security and diplomacy, environment and natural resource issues, and science and technology policy.

Like literally it’s the race-science white supremacist nazi-friendly ivy league school of the USA.

The fact that you got triggered by their choice of domain name is on you, not on them.

Oh fuck it’s Rainer coming at us. Gonna give this a read and see how far off base he is. This guy went full on PatSoc and started going after PSL in a totally disingenuous way and I can’t trust anything he’s written since.

https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-nov-26-2025

This report from the Harvard Kennedy school indicates that Russian forces gained 258 square miles of Ukrainian territory between end of Oct and Thanksgiving, with half of those gains in the week running up to Thanksgiving. I can’t find data for gains over the last 5 days, but the rate of Russian gains is increasing.

So wild that this is such a widespread phenomenon and yet Ukraine can’t seem to resist the onslaught of … unarmored and unarmed soldiers who eat nothing but tree bark and have to scavenge for their weapons and ammo.

Ukraine must be in really bad shape if they can’t defend against that, huh?