• hakunawazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    8 hours ago


    Hermione is mad at him. Maybe since she’s with Ron, she suppresses all her naughty thoughts about Fred and George.

    • tetris11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Malfoy suppresses his rage. He knows for sure that Fred had a bigger dick, but has to settle with George’s piece.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        Which begs the follow up question: are all Slytherins bottoms?

        Follow up, follow up: Was Voldemort a bottom?

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Welp…I went down an NSFW image search rabbit hole and, although far from being conclusive, my opinion is that yes, the penises are pretty much the same on identical siblings (saw a few triplets).

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Classic nature versus nurture debate. Assuming identical male twins, anyway. Anything else and the answer is far more likely to be “no”. Bob probably has a bigger D than his twin sister Sally. Probably.

      But once you narrow it down, well, they really ought to be the same unless something significant happened to one and not the other. Note that the significance of that thing might not at first appear to be significant, however.

      e.g. Maybe one time and only one time, Mom or Dad fed one of them twice by accident when the twins were infants and then had to the feed the hungry one “again” when he wouldn’t stop crying (if they realised the error or not).

      That one extra bottle of milk with no other differences might have made for a lifetime of difference between the two. And you still can’t be sure which one would end up better endowed. Maybe something latent in the twins’ genes would gives a hungry baby the advantage later in life, so to speak.

      ETA: If this sort of thing is your cup of tea, you might find pictures out there on the internet. If it isn’t, you might want to perform the same experiment using women’s attributes instead. I understand certain forms of twin “art” are quite popular.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Do twins look the same naked? Do siblings? Do sisters have the same boobs? Do brothers have the same balls?

      • tetris11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Beautiful, just beautiful. This! This is why we’re spending all that effort unwrapping those scrolls that Vesuvius tried to bury for some reason all those millennia ago.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t have any actual brothers but I do have friends who might as well be brothers. Are my balls both unique or is one of them identical to that of my bros?

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Plato says we all have imperfect copies of the ideal testicles, but Aristotle says you shouldn’t rely on theorising but test scientifically. Only by a thorough mutual examination of all your friends’ testicles can you really know.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sometimes. Once out of the hatch, environmental factors change each individual potentially in a different way. So while the template might be the same at start, further mutations can branch out in other aspects.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        More testosterone during the growth phase. So in theory, if one is leading a life that produces more or less testosterone, then they could be different.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Good question. For serious answers, try asking here https://lemmy.world/c/askscience or other similar communities.

        On my part, I can vaguely extract some theories from memory.

        One suggests some kind of insufficiency or excess during the growth phase can result in abnormal size of one or more organs, whether larger or smaller and usually accompanied by circulatory problems.

        Another suggests it a remnant of evolution, whether specific to a type of environment or early societal development.

        Of course, there’s also the chemical imbalance issue caused by unchecked industrial exploitation and pollution that causes the entire biological chain to mutate uncontrollably.

        But at their base, it’s usually hormones that are directed in some way by something either to grow or to stunt.

      • Pinklink@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Estrogen/testosterone balance probably. There are certain dietary factors that can change this. Tofu for instance has a chemical pretty analogous to estrogen, hence the term “soy boy”

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If this was true then every Asian man and woman would have tig ol biddies which is obviously untrue.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Plant estrogens, especially in the instance of soy, have been overwhelmingly shown to have no effects on our endocrine system. If growing breasts were as easy as eating tofu, a lot of transfem people would’ve been doing that over prescription meds