I am a Tasker enthusiast and when I can automate something simple on my phone I like to. I set a simple task to turn off WiFi when my home network is not detected so my phone doesn’t scan and report my location to businesses. However, this functionality is now nonexistent and the developer has to ask people not to one-star their app because it doesn’t work. My phone is my phone and killing my ability to use it as such for whatever security theater Google is playing at is why I root my device. Anyone else still rooting for similar reasons?

  • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    People still use Tasker? That makes me smile. I remember using it way back in the day and it was just incredible seeing the things other people came up with. Tasker allowed for so many features that took iOS and Android years to implement.

  • Ok_imagination@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve considered it for similar reasons to your own. I like using Tasker for Bluetooth and it seems most of that compatibility is removed now as well.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    TIL Tasker even worked without root lol.

    Also, why do we even need tasker to do that? iOS allows you to do that with its Shortcuts app lol, this is a weird moment when Android is becoming more closed and iOS open (in system wide features).

    Well, that is why I chuckle when people say there is no reason to root nowadays… Heck, not even banking apps will prevent me from rooting my phone, and my next android purchases are gonna be based in whether it can be rooted or not.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, you need Tasker because that’s one of the Android equivalents of the Shortcuts app.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure, but I meant, how is it that we don’t have a native tool for this (like Automator) or at least a system app from Google (like Shortcuts app).

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fair, I was being cheeky. I don’t know if I trust Google anymore to make and maintain a good app or service.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Come on, you know what I meant, compare pre iOS 7 with whichever Android was at that time… You can see nowadays the release updates are switching and iOS is implementing more features (or features that it should have had since the beginning lol) and Android is closing down more (Google’s fault and no root ofc).

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It barely works for Android 14+ without root. Macrodroid has much better compatibility for whatever reason.

      Unfortunately rooting while passing safetynet verification is very hard or impossible lately depending on the device. If apps didn’t unnecessarily check safetynet status this wouldn’t be a problem, but since so many now the rooted phone effectively becomes a brick. I really miss the days of custom ROMs and full device automation without stupid workarounds. Unfortunately, I don’t think there’s any going back without app developers getting on board with an alternative to Google-verified security on Android.

      • ben_dover@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        MD has a companion app, and you have to grant it special rights via adb (read/write secure settings) first. might also work for tasker

    • steinwand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rooting a device is a process that depends on the phone and manufacturer. On some devices it is flat out impossible, on other it is trivial (those tend to be increasingly rare). The steps usually go something like this

      1. Put your phone in developer mode
      2. Unlock the bootloader (that’s the part that is manufacturer/phone dependent)
      3. Use fastboot to install a replacement bootloader (I used TWRP in the past, now I use Orangefox)
      4. Once you have a good bootloader, youll be able to install apps from outside Android. This will enable you to give those specific app root access.
      5. Install Magisk or superSu or whatever app that gives you root access once booted back in android.

      Keep in mind that you can 100% brick your phone doing this and that it’ll most likely void your warranty. Do not root your device following this post alone. I tried to answer an ELI5, not a Teach Me How To Do It Like I’m 5.

      More information:

      • bootloader : that’s like the BIOS of your phone. It’s software that is used right before your OS (android) launches
      • fastboot : that’s a mode you can set your phone in that will enable you to run commands via a computer to which your phone is plugged by usb. You can upload custom code to it this way (such as a replacement bootloader)
      • https://orangefox.download/
        • Galaxy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It will disable incremental updates but as long as there is a flashable zip file of the full image you can update using that

          You can also quickly unroot then do an incremental update and then use magisk to create a flashable boot image afterwards to re-root

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Steps 2-3 are sadly impossible on most devices. If you have one of the bag ones, I’d recommend making some searches before you choose your next one.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tasker is anti-libre software. We do not control it. It fails to include a libre software license text file, like AGPL.

  • booly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I set a simple task to turn off WiFi when my home network is not detected so my phone doesn’t scan and report my location to businesses.

    I was under the impression that BSSID scanning was entirely passive, and that a phone that scans for beacons doesn’t actually reveal itself to anyone.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I get how it works with wifi connections, and Bluetooth scanning (since that’s a peer to peer protocol that needs to broadcast its availability), and obviously the OS-level location services, but I’m still not seeing how seeing wifi beacons would reveal anything. For one, pretty much every mobile device OS now uses MAC randomization so that your wifi activity on one network can’t be correlated with another. And for another, I think the BSSID scanning protocol is listen only for client devices.

        Happy to be proven wrong, and to learn more, but the article linked doesn’t seem to explain anything on this particular supposed threat.

  • Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    And now, even when your WiFi is off they still turn it on to “help with location tracking.” And they’re talking about taking away the ability to turn Bluetooth off.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How does it detect your home wifi if it has turned off wifi? I don’t know Android, but the logic there seems odd. Are you using location services to drive it?

    • Shepy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’ve misread that. When he leaves his home network, he has it switch off wifi to prevent it being picked up by other networks. Probably has it being switched back on by cell tower / similar location option

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think I did. I just assumed it would be impossible to detect the home network automatically once WiFi was automatically switched off. Unless off isn’t actually off. Or the “auto on” part was location based.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You are right, that is impossible, but it isn’t what they are doing.

          They are turning it back on either manually or by some other method (cell tower for instance). This automation seems to be to just turn it off.

      • dumbass@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just have your WiFi turn back on when you get back to your home, you can do location based stuff with tasker, I used to have it on my old phone and made it turn my phone on silent and turn off the WiFi when I got to work, but as soon as I got home it put my phne back to normal.

    • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Google has a disproportionate and overwhelming say in AOSP. What do you think Lineage OS is based on?

      When Google makes API changes to Android, it hurts AOSP too. Can the devs try to maintain the legacy API on their own? Sure, but it’s extra effort, so it’s usually not something you can count on.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, but there isn’t a lot of options. At least with Lineage OS the apps are all separate and not abandonware

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Security and Privacy are not the same thing.

      Stock Google is absolutely a hit to ones privacy, but LineageOS is a often big hit to device security.

      If you don’t have a Pixel, and therefore can’t use GrapheneOS, check and see if your device is compatible with DivestOS.

      However, neither will offer root support for reasons that both devs have decent write-ups explaining within each project’s documentation.

      I do realize that not everyone places security above all other factors when deciding on their smartphone OS, but I think they should be aware of the trade-offs so they can make an informed decision.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lineage OS is in fact not terrible for security. Other than a unlocked boot loader I have not seen anything wrong with it.

        As for Divest OS is has all the same issues as Graphene OS.

        • Emotet@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why do you keep stating blatantly false info as facts when it is obvious that you’re knowledge of the topic at hand is superficial at best?

          In this comment thread alone you’ve stated that:

          • to avoid “Google Android”, one should use Lineage OS (?)
          • Apps on Lineage are some kind of separated on Lineage OS and not abandonware (??)
          • Lineage OS is not terrible for security, because you haven’t found anything wrong with it besides that small little, insignificant detail of an unlocked bootloader (???)
          • DivestOS has “all the same issues” as GrapheneOS(???)

          Genuinely not trying to stir up shit, I’m curious. Why?

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The inability to relock the bootloader is gigantic security vulnerability. It negates, or entirely voids, a significant amount of a devices physical security, including FDE.

          There are other security issues with LineageOS, but that’s part of the trade-off. There’s nothing inherently sinister or incompetent about that, it’s just the nature of the beast.

          Regardless, I’m not here to chastise anyone’s choice of OS, or to even imply that there is a right, and wrong ROM, there isn’t.

          I was just pointing out that there are pros and cons, and users should be aware of them when making those decisions.