• Rekonok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      2019 sounds like so far in the past…

      Texas must have fixed those stupids rules? Maybe they have fixed the houses crisis…

      Please I really could use some hope right now

  • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been following some of these folks on social media who do this every couple of weeks. It’s crazy. The police were arresting them for giving away food. So they went through the courts and won the right to feed homeless people. Crazy right. The even crazier part is the cops sit across the street every single time they give out free food and hygiene items and harass them, take photos and other ACAB sort of shit. 4-6 cruisers at a time. Insane.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its only crazy if you don’t want to look at why they’re doing it square in the eye. Please don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t judge anyone doing it, presuming it does apply a little you yourself. I could be wrong of course. The truth is very, very ugly and not something anyone would want to be true.

      Despite their claims, the problem was never the cost to the government of feeding the homeless, as can be seen. The reason the police do this is that wage slaves won’t be forced back into the worst, most poorly paid jobs we can find if they’re not facing death by starvation.

      It was the same in the UK, back when they made feeding the homeless illegal and the penalty being being homeless OR without a job for 3 days was being sent to the workhouse where you might well be worked to death.

      Its the same thing, centuries apart.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That is the role of the state and capitalists but that is not what is on the mind of an abusive cop. They believe the bullshit.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The reason the police do this is that wage slaves won’t be forced back into the worst, most poorly paid jobs we can find if they’re not facing death by starvation.

        Systemically, yes this is why the police are allowed broadly by society to discourage helping those in need.

        On a more personal, fundamental and visceral level, it’s because the police are a product of people who have held power for a long, long time. And you know what poor and homeless people are to the systems that maintain the status quo? They’re an inconvenient reminder that our system is designed to benefit a few, and that there are people hoarding gold and diamond backscratchers for every day of the week while children starve on the street.

        That’s a pretty downer reminder, isn’t it? Throw in some of our human vices that we all share from top to bottom like substance abuse and you have a complete picture of what any of us could become if we’re not careful.

        See, for the vast majority of comfortable Americans, the homeless they pass every day are not reminders that humans need help, they are a reminder of failure. In a world where success is measured in dollar signs and possessions, someone without either is a scary, harsh reminder that we’re all on a tightrope.

        Brush them aside. Put them somewhere. Get them into some kind of “camp” and shuffle them out of view, lest they spoil this perfect image we have created of the modern world.

    • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I had1 a friend in middle school who shared my name. We’d hang out together all the time and play Super Mario Bros 3 and ride our bikes all over and shit. Dude was chill. Then he went into the army, came out, and become a cop in Dallas PD.

      1Had.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes I have. It’s called a sword cane. I happen to have some knee damage, and if I play up my limp a bit, no one even looks twice at my cane.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I did, something like 15 years back.

          It’s okay quality, but I did have to fix the rattle of the sheath. Just ripped one of the faces off a piece of cardboard, and then rolled it up and shoved it in the sheath. Now the cane doesn’t rattle at all when you shake it, but it still draws smoothly.

          Honestly, any of my solid canes would make a great weapon, but people never realize it, so the sword cane is mostly for the intimidation option.

          Almost anyone can recognize a sword as a weapon, even if I could ruin your day just as much with a wooden hook cane.

          • Xanis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            To be fair, the difference between a hook cane and sword cane is one can cause bruising up to a concussion, with a low chance of broken bones. While the other creates a sequel to Highlander. So your day might be ruined by one; the other makes sure there is only one.

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, no, that thing was six inches so it’s definitely the sword you’re seeing.

    • Fishbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Big dresses and a lotta cleavage means you got no idea who’s got a concealed sword at a ren faire.

        • Fishbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          lol I’m not describing myself here, I’m just a fish with no meat.

          It’s just been (oddly, I think) a recurring thing that multiple friends have done at ren faires (and costume parties). I know at least 3 people who have done the concealed boob sword thing, and plenty of extras who opted for bottles of hard alcohol instead.

  • danafest@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Armed to deter cops actually sounds like a viable plan in Texas after what we saw at Uvalde

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Texas boggles my mind because it’s such a blue state with some of the deepest red politicians running the place.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Congressional districts should have a perimiter-area ratio limit, and the largest district should not be allowed to contain 10% more people than the smallest district.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I like that and it would probably work better than suing over a gerrymandered map only for the courts to uphold the crazy district, exactly what happened with the Texas 2nd Congressional District map.

            Honestly with our current level of technology, a more direct democracy approach like a popular vote representation based on stance alignment would probably work better. For example, Average Joe would optionally select a party and then vote on policies, and the representatives would have selected their policies to align with constituents. Policies and candidates on ballot would be chosen through a regular primary, so each party might have separate policies on the ballot. Independents could select a mix of each and get automatically assigned a politician.

            I bet the GOP wouldn’t even oppose it because they love forcing people to commit to a party.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      A whole lot of empty land seems to have really important votes, since theirs seems go count for than mine.

    • SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s food serving legislation being taken too far. The clothes I think are fine, but since they’re not inspected by the health department like a restaurant the government can technically shut it down which is complete bullshit.

        • SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Anecdotally, I don’t think so. I used to do some work with a place that did a lot of charity work and would get together bi-weekly to talk about travel and have a banquet. The banquet was always prepared and served in accordance with the law, and there were often tons of leftovers. So we would give the leftovers to the homeless. The health department fined us because we weren’t allowed to serve food outside of our establishment.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s what the to-go bags are for.

            When I was living on the streets of Boston, one day a random dude showed up giving out McDonalds cheeseburgers. Didn’t look very official. He just rolled up with a big bag and started giving them out.

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                The double cheeseburgers differ from the McDouble only in that the McDouble has one more slice of cheese.

                The double cheeseburgers are also buy one, get one for $1. Here in denver that means $4.50 for two of them.

                Probably the most bang for your buck if they’ve got the same deal going there.

                • Retrograde@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Hell yeah, it’s embarrassing but I did already know this, lol. Double cheese for life. Also, Denver for life, I’m from Colorado originally :)

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Did you have some kind of serve safe license that was limited? I wonder why the rules were different than a restaurant letting people take leftovers home.

            Were you guys handing out huge trays of food like after thanksgiving or a party, like “who wants this half a turkey in these ziplock bags”, or was it more like a bunch of to go containers handed out?

            Seems like the seal of government approval on a person’s ability to handle food safety should apply equally to serving in the restaurant and to prepping food for serving outside that building. Right? Just too complex to have it separated out like that.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, the Good Samaritan Act says free food doesn’t have to be inspected as long as it’s given “in good faith apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery products to a nonprofit organization for ultimate distribution to needy individuals”

        https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2020/08/13/good-samaritan-act-provides-liability-protection-food-donations

        All fifty states and the District of Columbia have additional food donation statues that limit food donor’s liability—these currently vary widely, such as by who (i.e., donors, nonprofit organizations), and what foods and food products are covered.

        state laws may provide greater protection against liability, but not less

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If only there were some way to fact check … some video evidence of what happened … if only they had YouTube channels documenting all of it.

        Ah well, let’s not even bother to look it up.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Its not a crime to feed homeless people. They say that because they want to cause division in the US and anger against the government.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          More like look up what OP says and realize its bullshit. Lemmy has become so disappointing with all the blind acceptance of this kind of nonsense.

              • Syrc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                This article talks about the ordinance. Yes, you can feed them in specific situations and places. Still, you can’t tell me it isn’t making it intentionally hard to do.

                • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Pretty big assumption that all the governments in the many cities with laws like this are evil people coordinating efforts to starve homeless people.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Like the fact that that headline is sensational and wrong? Its not illegal to feed homeless people in those cities, the city governments just require people to get permits and do it in a safe way.