• Despair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a jet injector.

      Numerous studies have found cross-infection of diseases from jet injections. An experiment using mice, published in 1985, showed that jet injectors would frequently transmit the viral infection lactate dehydrogenase elevating virus (LDV) from one mouse to another.[16] Another study used the device on a calf, then tested the fluid remaining in the injector for blood. Every injector they tested had detectable blood in a quantity sufficient to pass on a virus such as hepatitis B.[15]

    • whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The original press release stated this was done using machine learning, which has been a mainstay in biomedical science for a while. It’s what “AI” used to refer to before the current generation of bullshit generators.

      • BL4CKP1XX13@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but from what I understand traditional machine learning is more about introspective pattern recognition and not necessarily inference-based synthesis?

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s true for all research in medicine. The suggestion to not check for errors is mental and would only be suggested by non technical people.

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I am sorry, but did you read that I was talking about medicine first and foremost?

            Also using evidence based approaches can be beneficial for longevity of any company and if you truly believe otherwise, then that’s your perogative.