• Ptsf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s not a product for everyone and that’s okay. It still has the most advanced optics and highest resolution displays you can purchase in a vr headset.

  • SoupBrick@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Too bad apple didn’t focus on the existing hardcore market and tried to create a new market nobody wanted.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      TBH, the things required to make it appealing to the core VR market are things Apple wouldn’t do

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    There’s a dude at work who has one and uses it for calls. He says it’s for travel, so he can have “bigger” monitors wherever he goes.

    But he always has his camera on, and some AI filter that replaces his face so the headset doesn’t appear.

    And it looks fucking awful. It’s at the lowest depths of the uncanny valley. It’s a facade that doesn’t blink right, that floats around, with a mouth that doesn’t match his speech. Its like it was designed to be off-putting.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Wait, so you’re saying he uses traditional Zoom or whatever on this computer with a camera? And then he uses some sort of software to hide the Vision Pro?

      And he’s doesn’t use the built in Persona and the meeting apps native on the Vision Pro? Strange.

      But you might also be confused and not realize it’s not using a camera, and AI to filter out the headset.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          You should ask him to try a new capture.

          You also sound like you’re on the sensitive end of the spectrum with these avatars. I personally get use to them super fast. Especially when in VR with them. But yeah, they are approximations.

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I wouldn’t recommend anyone buying it, unless you’re really rich and you don’t know what to do with your money.

    Says it all, really.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Well, no. This thing has higher resolution OLED screens, eye tracking, better cameras and is much more powerful. It’s also pretty useless outside of being a tech demo, so I wouldn’t even compare the two.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    For my VR experience, I just want to have 360 degrees of terminal windows everywhere Iook.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    LOL you bought Apple’s bullshit. Do you know how much easier my life would become overnight if I suddenly had $3,500 extra dollars? I gotta get a bad tooth pulled tomorrow because I can’t afford a root canal. I have to finance the tooth extraction. Being poor in this country is a nightmare. And these idiots are just having buyers remorse over buying a stupid headset for $3,500? They deserve to suffer.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    It’s nothing more than a very expensive monitor you have to wear on your head. Even if you think of it as an SDK for some hypothetical future device, Apple hasn’t come close to even hinting at the promise or potential of AR. Not only is their overpriced, over-engineered hardware not up to snuff, the software isn’t up to snuff if taken merely a proof of concept.

    I still think that AR is the inevitable future, but not in this form and not soon. I may not even live to see it.