• seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Repeated intermittent forced withdrawal from an addicting influence shows no significant positive impact on comprehension in the short term.

    The authors go on to suggest water is wet.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Head teacher Ian Gerrard says while bullying hasn’t been “completely eradicated”, the pouches have created “a safe space within school”

    Has it reduced bullying, or just the ability to document it?

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Was obvious to anyone. Nothing wrong with phones except isolating outcasts, neuroduvergents and minorities from the world and forcing them with no escape to suffer the bullying from their teachers and class etc.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m also neurodivergent. I actually had a library with access to infinite books, it’s called a telephone and/or laptop and the internet, where all books are free and easily accessible.

        • northernscrub@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I, too, am aware of zlib and librera reader. But there’s a difference between a curated selection of books in physical form in front of you, and deciding to read a book on an electronic device. The former dissuades the reader-to-be from abandoning the idea over too wide a selection, and removes other electronic distractions from asserting themselves over the reading material - I refer here to notifications that flash over the current window.

          Plus, there’s plenty of people who choose not to read, despite the option being available. Having the option physically there in front of you is far more encouraging, in my opinion. And once they start reading, they might go on to seek titles outside of that curated selection. Great success!

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            But there’s a difference between a curated selection of books

            Look up a listicle? Da-doink

            in physical form in front of you

            Fair, but that shit ain’t cheap.

            and deciding to read a book on an electronic device.

            If the book is good you’ll read it however you can. I once read the entirety of the Berserk manga at my desktop PC in a shitty wooden chair.

            The former dissuades the reader-to-be from abandoning the idea over too wide a selection

            This is pure pop psychological speculation.

            other electronic distractions from asserting themselves over the reading material - I refer here to notifications that flash over the current window.

            Turn them off?

            Plus, there’s plenty of people who choose not to read, despite the option being available.

            And so there were before phones. A lack of curiosity wasn’t invented in 2008, even if it may feel like it if that’s when you were born.

            However - wider availability has almost always increased literacy other factors notwithstanding, from the printing press to the digital media of today.

            Having the option physically there in front of you is far more encouraging, in my opinion.

            I fully disagree. If anything - it’s about meeting people where they’re at, and today - people are on their phones.

            And once they start reading, they might go on

            Indeed, and you’re not gonna get them to start by making them go to a library like some nerd, but by getting them to be interested via the places they’re already at.